top of page
Search

The Quiet Return to Brand and Why It Actually Matters Right Now

  • Kate Atkisson
  • 4 days ago
  • 3 min read

Brand, Performance, and the Structural Correction in Marketing

If you’ve been in enough marketing conversations lately, you’ve probably noticed something subtle but unmistakable.


The conversation has changed.


Not loudly. Not dramatically. But steadily. The language is shifting away from performance marketing and what worked last quarter, and back toward questions that sound almost unfashionable in modern marketing. What do we actually stand for? Why would someone choose us amongst our competitors? What story is the market telling about us, whether we intended it or not?


This isn’t nostalgia. And it isn’t a backlash against performance marketing. It’s a growing discomfort with how fragile growth has started to feel.

Clicks cost more. Channels saturate faster. Attribution is messier. Teams keep pulling the same levers, only to find the returns flatten sooner every cycle. What once felt precise now feels brittle.


Performance Can't Be the Whole Strategy

Performance marketing is not the problem. Done well, it accelerates demand. It creates momentum. It delivers results.


The problem comes when performance becomes the entire structure instead of part of a larger system.


The data reflects this tension clearly. Gartner’s 2025 CMO Spend Survey shows that while most leaders continue to prioritize performance in their budgets, 85 percent agree that brand investment drives business results even though it’s harder to measure. Leaders know the foundation matters, but pressure pushes spend toward what feels immediate and provable.


At the same time, marketing budgets have largely flatlined, hovering around 7.7 percent of company revenue. Expectations keep rising while resources stay fixed. That combination encourages short-term optimization at the expense of long-term strength.


This is where the house of cards starts to wobble. When growth relies too heavily on performance levers, it holds only as long as the environment stays stable. A platform change, a privacy shift, rising media costs, or simple audience fatigue can pull out a single card and suddenly the structure feels precarious.


This Isn’t a Trend. It’s a Structural Correction.

What we’re seeing now is not a swing back to brand because brand is fashionable again. It’s a structural correction.


The research has been pointing in this direction for years. Studies from WARC and McKinsey consistently show that brand investment lowers customer acquisition costs and improves conversion efficiency. As brand awareness increases, performance marketing doesn’t have to work as hard to convince, explain, or overcome skepticism.


Analytic Partners’ ROI Genome data reinforces this. Brand marketing outperforms performance marketing in overall ROI most of the time, and more importantly, brand investment lifts the effectiveness of performance campaigns themselves. Brand does not compete with performance. It supports it.


This is the part that often gets missed. Brand is not something you do instead of performance. It is what allows performance to scale without constantly resetting to zero.

When brand is weak, performance has to do all the work. When brand is strong, performance becomes an accelerator instead of a crutch.


Brand Drives Sustainable Growth

Strong brand work does not explode overnight. It compounds.


A brand with clarity does not need to reintroduce itself every quarter. It does not rely on constant promotion to earn attention. It carries trust forward. It builds preference before a buyer ever enters a funnel.


BCG’s research shows that cutting brand investment creates a long-term penalty that is expensive to undo. Every dollar pulled from brand today costs significantly more to recover lost ground later. Brand equity depreciates quickly when neglected, and rebuilding it takes time, consistency, and patience.


This is why the return to brand feels quiet. It isn’t performative. It isn’t about big campaigns or clever taglines. It’s about rebuilding the underlying structure so growth can actually hold.

Brand is what makes momentum durable. It’s what lowers friction. It’s what allows performance tactics to work better instead of harder.


At Ripple Effect, we see this shift clearly. The brands that are winning now are not chasing every new lever. They are investing in clarity. They are defining who they are, why they matter, and how they show up consistently in the market.


This isn’t about choosing brand over performance. It’s about recognizing that without brand, performance eventually runs out of road.


Rebuild the foundation. The rest works better when you do.

 
 
 
bottom of page